Blog
An Alarming Gap


Esta dirección electrónica esta protegida contra spambots. Es necesario activar Javascript para visualizarla

The RI General Assembly is currently considering legislation that would make strangulation a felony domestic assault. In fact 30 other states have already passed this type of law.

If your partner strangles you they are telling you that they hold your life in their hands and have the power to end it. And if you call the police right now in Rhode Island, your abuser will be charged with simple assault, which is a misdemeanor.

Simple assault!

Leer más... [An Alarming Gap]
 
Our Response to Politifact Rhode Island


politifact

politifact

Esta dirección electrónica esta protegida contra spambots. Es necesario activar Javascript para visualizarla

Note: The following is a letter to the editor of the Providence Journal that we submitted after Politifact Rhode Island issued a ruling of "Half True" on a statement made by Senator Beatrice Lanzi about the prevalence of teen dating violence. To read their ruling, click here.

To the Editor:

We were disappointed to see Politifact Rhode Island’s recent ruling on Senator Beatrice Lanzi’s statement that "One out of four of our young people say they are victims of this (dating) violence."

We take issue with the process that Politifact used to check this claim. The article points to several sources which provide similar statistics on the prevalence of teen dating violence, and notes that those sources define teen dating violence as emotional, verbal or physical abuse. Politifact was able to clarify with Senator Lanzi that she indeed used that definition – the same definition used by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, Politifact then goes on to disregard this definition without providing justification, and rules Senator Lanzi’s statement is “Half True”.

Leer más... [Our Response to Politifact Rhode Island]
 
What is in the Best Interest of Our Children?

Inherent and Civil Parental Law vs. Civil Custody Law

Safety for Children

By Renee’ F. Brissette

The natural, Divine, and even governmental laws of parenting have been thrown into a dangerous quandary by the perplexing family court rulings throughout this country that are forcing many to ask, who knows what is in the best interest of our children? As a parent, I strive to love, care for, protect, and teach my children well with the hope that they will become the best person they can be—leading happy, healthy, and productive lives.  I think it is safe to say that this is what most parents try to do for their children. These desires and tendencies may stem from an inner maternal/paternal instinct coupled with a moral and spiritual compass. 

So, when children are young, to protect them from harm, we teach them how to tie their shoes, to not touch hot stoves, to not talk to strangers, and look before they cross the street. As they get older we teach them lessons of right and wrong, kindness and cooperation, to not hang with the “wrong” crowds, to “say no to drugs,” and to never stay anywhere or go with anyone who they are not safe with. It is not only natural and/or Divine law that leads parents to protect, care, and provide for their children — it is the law of this country.

Yet, parents across the states are being faced with a legal and moral conundrum.  While the government laws require parents to care for and protect their children on the one hand, family court systems, in case after case, are ordering them to place their children in harms way. The latest case making news headlines just this past week involves a mother in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina who had to choose to do what she knows is in the best interest of her children, or complying with a court order. 

Leer más... [What is in the Best Interest of Our Children?]
 
Rihanna & Chris Brown: Using the buzz as an opportunity

chris_brown0

Esta dirección electrónica esta protegida contra spambots. Es necesario activar Javascript para visualizarla

Chris Brown’s recent appearance on the Grammy’s, and the subsequent release of two collaborative tracks featuring Chris Brown and Rihanna, have sparked new conversation about the incident of abuse that happened 3 years ago. We are encouraging everyone to talk to the young people in their lives about the Chris Brown and Rihanna case for two reasons.

To begin with, most young people are aware of the situation and hold a lot of misconceptions about what happened (and about dating violence in general, for that matter).  Take this opportunity to make sure they have the facts and aren’t harboring false “reasons” for why the incident occurred or false understandings of the severity of this case and of dating violence in general.

Additionally, teens are at high risk for experiencing dating violence — a staggering 1 in 3 adolescent girls in the U.S. is a victim of abuse by their dating partner.  And yet nearly three-quarters of teens indicate that their parents have not talked to them about relationships in the past year.

So if you decide to use these new songs as an opportunity to talk to a young person about dating violence, here are some questions & conversation starters to help you out:

Leer más... [Rihanna & Chris Brown: Using the buzz as an opportunity]
 
Every Woman's Dream Date?

Every woman's dream date

Esta dirección electrónica esta protegida contra spambots. Es necesario activar Javascript para visualizarla

“Let’s get food at the Red Lobster, my treat” (Happy Gilmore). Sounds like the opening sentence to every girl’s dream night, right? At least that’s what Florida Judge John Hurley thought when he ruled that 39 year-old Sonja Bray go on a date with her husband, after he shoved her onto a sofa and brutally strangled her in their home earlier this week.

Judge Hurley claimed he usually would not handle a case of domestic violence so lightly, but he believed John Bray’s violent abuse towards his wife was “very, very minor” (source: FL newspaper, Sun Sentinel).\

I’m not sure what seafood Judge Hurley was eating, but strangulation by one’s husband does not sound very minor to me. Especially since victims of strangulation are nine times more likely to be murdered by their partner after the incident occurred.

In the courtroom, Judge Hurley questioned Sonja while her husband was present. He asked, point blank, if she had been hurt or was in fear of her husband. Although Sonja claimed she was not, the arrest affidavit tells a slightly different story. Clearly, Sonja was frightened enough to even call the police in the first place. Not to mention the detailed report she gave of the violent actions he had taken towards her. Regardless of these two blatant pieces of evidence, Judge Hurley decided a romantic dinner date, followed by a few games of bowling would cure all the couple’s problems. 
Leer más... [Every Woman's Dream Date?]
 
<< Inicio < Anterior 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Siguiente > Fin >>

Página 1 de 8